 |
| | < x264 Video Codec rev. 1342 : Reviews |
Rating: 4.1 | | |
 x264 Video Codec rev. 1288
Date: 13 Oct 2009 | Rating: 4 | Written by: latte |
13. |
You cant compare it with xvid. Xvid and divx are for poor or blind people. x264 + Splash player and ATI GPU decoding = eye candy :)
|
x264 Video Codec rev. 967
Date: 11 Sep 2008 | Rating: 5 | Written by: lukas |
12. |
x264 Video Codec rev. 798
Date: 28 Mar 2008 | Rating: 5 | Written by: Anton |
11. |
This is very, very good codec.
|
x264 Video Codec rev. 736
Date: 29 Jan 2008 | Rating: 5 | Written by: renegadeviking |
10. |
Better than Xvid. VFW version is unreal! The desktop shots look beautiful. Does jaggies from time to time, but 90% of the time I can't see jaggies at 313 kbps.
rev. 735
|
x264 Video Codec rev. 665
Date: 15 Jul 2007 | Rating: 5 | Written by: Vboy |
9. |
The best codec. Earlier i used to use Xvid for iPod videos.Now i use H264 for encoding.A bit slow
than Xvid but quality is much superior. 2-Pass H264 gives the best quality by any codec.
|
x264 Video Codec rev. 635
Date: 30 Mar 2007 | Rating: 5 | Written by: Yoones |
8. |
Woooooooooooo The best Codec around world.
|
x264 Video Codec rev. 536
Date: 17 Jul 2006 | Rating: 5 | Written by: jackie |
7. |
should be the best codec now
compressibility is almost the best with a good avs and setting
color and visual quality can be tweaked with using a CQM and suitable setting
compatibility won't be a problem because of its advantages and source opening
de-blocking filter should be turned on forever because it helps increasing the compressibility and the only thing to do is to adjust it(from -3 to 3, or from -6 to 6 with ultra-low btirate)
speed is slow without doubt, but it should and it must bt slow
this codec is for next generational encoding
its speed won't be a problem
(in fact, it isn't so slow if not encoding a 720p stuff or something similar)
|
x264 Video Codec rev. 533
Date: 7 Jul 2006 | Rating: 4 | Written by: x264 Video Codec rev. 533 |
6. |
Slow as hell, even on the fastest machines! And that is the only problem I can think of. Other than that, the best codec out there, even at this stage.
|
x264 Video Codec rev. 523
Date: 13 May 2006 | Rating: 1 | Written by: Phil |
5. |
Too much "co", not enough "dec".
I'm no video geek - all I want is to get my machine to stop telling me it can't play these vids. This doesn't do that, or if it does I can't figure out how.
|
x264 Video Codec rev. 468
Date: 15 Mar 2006 | Rating: 5 | Written by: NuPogodi |
4. |
ATM, x264 does bit any other codec i've tested... Compressibility = 5, bitrate control at 2-pass encodings = 5, encoding speed = 3.
|
x264 Video Codec rev. 440
Date: 25 Feb 2006 | Rating: 5 | Written by: hungryjoe |
3. |
better quality than any other codec i've used, however the de-blocking filter gives many features a smeared appearance and should be turned off at any bit-rate. the codec default is to use de-blocking during encoding, the first thing you should do after installing is turn that feature off or adjust the strength and threshold to a level that doesn't make your video look like putty.
|
x264 Video Codec rev. 440
Date: 24 Feb 2006 | Rating: 3 | Written by: Otherworldly |
2. |
I don't agree
it's a good one h.264 codec and it's free
gave me better contrast than XviD in reencoding some old videos
|
x264 Video Codec rev. 409
Date: 31 Jan 2006 | Rating: 1 | Written by: kenshin |
1. |
Very problematic codec
compression size -ok-
color and compatibility -bad-
|
|
|
|
|
